To know

In the world of knowledge, everyday something new is added. In pursuit of the way, everyday something is let go. - Lao Tzu

From any remote spot one can access information electronically: the library, computer, interactive exchanges about math, the latest news from anywhere in the world is at hand. But this is not the same as wisdom.

We have answering machines, fax machines, and email. But people seem to be not so much communicating as dumping. As long as they have sent a message, they feel absolved of all responsibilities with a minimum of inconvenience, social contact, or feed back.

The ancients had a very different attitude toward knowledge and wisdom. Many of them were swordsmen and, as they word 'shi' implies, they had to truly know the sword before they were ready to stake life and death on it. The ancients taught that one did not truly know something until that knowledge was part of one's very own soul. So before they ever ventured out with a sword, the swordsmen trained to put skill into the fiber of their muscles. Then they trained further, until their skill became part of their reflexes. Then they trained even more, until their skill became intrinsic to their minds. Then they emptied their minds, so that their skill was part of their spirit. Only then would they say that they knew enough to go to battle.

What is knowing today? True, we have an unprecedented amount of information available on an unprecedented sacle. But the resolutions to the true questions of life come not thorugh mere communications and thinking, no matter how quick or vast. The come from knowing and converting knowledge into wisdom. And knowing comes only when we have made the answers part of ourselves.

For the ladies: cosmetic truth

Some Important info here folks, there are of course links at the bottom after the video and article.Also check out Ava Anderson who has been featured in Glamour,TEEN VOGUE, AOL STYLEIST.COM, and other major media and other publications. http://www.avaandersonnontoxic.com/

Click on people's faces in the photo to tag them.

 The 515 chemicals women put on their bodies every day.

Women and beauty products - it's a love affair that's been going on for centuries. And no wonder. There's nothing like a new lipstick or favourite perfume to make us look and feel good. Or so we thought...

In fact, according to a new report, most of our favourite cosmetics are cocktails of industrially produced and potentially dangerous chemicals that could damage our health and, in some cases, rather than delivering on their potent 'anti-ageing' promise, are causing us to age faster.

Research by Bionsen, a natural deodorant company, found that the average woman's daily grooming and make-up routine means she 'hosts' a staggering 515 different synthetic chemicals on her body every single day.

Many of those are also used in products such as household cleaners, and have been linked to a number of health problems from allergies and skin sensitivity to more serious hormonal disturbances, fertility problems and even cancer.

Parabens, for example, which are designed to preserve the shelf-life of your cosmetics, are one of the most widely used preservatives in the world, and are found in shampoos, hair gels, shaving gels and body lotions. But their use is becoming increasingly controversial - a range of different studies has linked them to serious health problems including breast cancer, as well as fertility issues in men.

Research from the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine suggests that some parabens we had previously presumed to be safe, such as Methylparaben, may mutate and become toxic when exposed to sunlight, causing premature skin ageing and an increased risk of skin cancer.

Methylparabens are found in more than 16,000 products, including moisturisers and toothpastes. Cosmetic producers have always defended their use of parabens on the grounds that they can't be absorbed into the body.

But many leading researchers disagree, including Dr Barbara Olioso, an independent professional chemist, who says: 'Research shows that between 20 and 60 per cent of parabens may be absorbed into the body.'

There are a number of laws designed to protect us from dangerous chemicals in cosmetics, but researchers worry that they don't go far enough. For example, cosmetic manufacturers are required to list their ingredients, but they don't have to tell us about any impurities found in the raw materials or used in the manufacturing process, so long as they don't end up in the finished product.

The industry insists that our cosmetics are safe. The Cosmetic Toiletries and Perfumery Association said last night: 'Stringent laws require all cosmetics to be safe, and each product undergoes a rigorous safety assessment. The number of ingredients in a product, or whether it is natural or man-made, has no bearing on how safe it is.'

They also say that any chemicals are present in safe doses that can't harm us. While that may be true, there is some disagreement over what constitutes a 'safe' level - for young people and children, or sensitive adults, these levels may not be so safe at all.

And even if the relatively small amounts in individual products don't hurt us, there is growing concern over the number of products women use daily, and the cumulative effect of so many chemicals being used all over our bodies every day, for many years.

As Charlotte Smith, spokesperson for Bionsen, says: 'Women have never been more image-conscious and their beauty regimes have changed over the years, from a simple "wash & go" attitude, to daily fake-tan applications, regular manicures, false lashes and hair extensions.

'Lots of the high-tech, new generation cosmetics and beauty "wonder" treatments naturally contain more chemicals to achieve even better results, which, of course, means women apply more chemicals than ever before.'

If you want to protect yourself from chemical overload, reduce your overall cosmetics usage; switch to natural or organic products, and read the labels on your beauty and grooming products with care.

Note from Theresa: the picture left out aluminum in deodorant and how that is also a carcinogen that increases the risk of breast cancer. Use mineral makeup!

Links:

Toxic Burden: Women Put 515 Chemicals on Their Faces Every Day

Avon under fire over carcinogenic and estrogenic ingredients

*List: Common Hazardous Ingredients in Personal Care Products
http://www.naturalliving4u.com/common_personal_care_product_toxins

*Cosmetic products found to contain 175 different toxic chemicals
http://www.naturalnews.com/020303.html

*List:The Hidden Toxins in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products
http://www.naturallyhome.com/articles/skindeep.shtml

*Toxic Cosmetics Ingredient List
http://www.alkalizeforhealth..net/Ltoxiccosmetics.htm

*Cosmetics products routinely formulated with cancer-causing chemicals
http://www.naturalnews.com/021807.html

*The cosmetics poison woman’s organism
http://www.medical-portal.org/in/90

*Cosmetics to die for
http://stason.org/articles/wellbeing/health/Cosmetics-To-Die-For.html

*Toxic Cosmetics and Environment =Toxic Body  and the ugly side of cosmetics
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/toxic-cosmetics.htm

*Top 20 Most Dangerous Cosmetic Toxins
http://www.natural-skincare-authority.com/cosmetic-toxins.html

*Are your beauty products making you sick?
http://www.rawguru.com/sick.html

*Search result on topic of toxic cosmetics
http://www.naturalnews.com/cosmetics.html

*Exposure to toxins from cosmetic info
http://www.brantleycure.com/healthInfo/exposureToxinsCosmetics.pdf

*Chemicals Found in Cosmetics Linked to Future Infertility
http://www.naturalnews.com/024360.html

*Hormone-Altering Cosmetics Chemicals
http://www.ewg.org/reports/teens

*Petroleum-based cosmetics and skin care products found to contain cancer-causing chemical 1,4-dioxane
http://www.naturalnews.com/021717.html

*Cosmetic Chemicals Watch-List: The "A" to "Z" Of Toxins in Skin Care
http://www.natural-skincare-authority.com/cosmetic-chemicals.html

*Cosmetic database- look up products for toxicity
http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/company..php?comp_id=899

*http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/browse.php?comp_id=899

*Parabens in Cosmetics: Friends or Foes?
http://www.naturalnews.com/022113.html

*Book:Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry
http://astore.amazon.com/wsdm-20/detail/0865715742/105-4703199-0991601

*Nano Particles in Cosmetics Pose Safety Danger to Consumers
http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000441_cosmetics_nano_particles_public_health.html

Anger- the child trying to be heard

Anger, when observed without emotion can be likened to a child who screams not only because it doesn't know how else to be recognized, but also vents because it cannot fully grasp the feelings and situations it faces. The complexity of emotions overwhelms the mind and a burst of energy is released to vent tension built up. But this is an example of unconscious anger. Being angry for unjust things about this world, mistreatment etc. is another story. But for the most part anger is an underdeveloped part of ourselves that needs to be developed; a flabby aspect of our personality that needs to tighten up.. you get the point. But doing is harder than thinking and anything that results in progress takes time. Self awareness is important and in that comes many feelings about ourselves that can cause injury. We realize we are weak, we are stubborn, we are unhappy and we don't like realizing this. We don't like the truth. But alas, this is why we act out in anger to begin with. All the feelings of inadequacy, uncertainty, our discontent for the world, the fact that we have to abide by rules and laws, jobs and idiots in order to acquire the things we need to survive. I know this.

But in your anger you lose yourself to the battle in this life for personal freedom and identity. You become changed by the world, instead of changing the world. I know your fear of loss and your struggle with fate, I know that it takes everything that you have to face the day. And the virtues you possess only seem to bring pain, all you have is contempt for a life you can't obtain. Face your torment and dismantle your doubt. Refuse a legacy of shame and defeat. Remain untouched by the world and its woes. You want to be happy? Then practice being happy, thinking happy.

Wake the dreamer, change the dream.

If I took everyone on earth and asked them to paint a picture of a tree before them, each person would create a different painting. Each would have different details, dimension, shading and perspective revealing the individuality of us all. More than that, it displays how we each hold a unique perspective of something that reveals truth to us. But ultimately, no matter how different and true each persons version of painting the tree would be, if asked to paint the roots you would have to speculate, since the roots are kept from plain sight.

Our history is passed from lips to minds the same way, it is our own dream of what we have pieced together. Medicine, law, politics, religions, even scientific facts get distorted by peoples perspectives because the roots remain unseen. The power of the brain is to pull from darkness and void something that we did not see before and then bring it into the light of understanding. I also believe knowledge is only good if it is turned into wisdom, otherwise it is a seed that has never turned into a tree; it will always be left to speculation. To tie in the relationship we have to our modern world I am going to speak about a point in history many of us have created paintings for. It is a time that has molded the medical, scientific, economic and social era we find ourselves in. It is and always will be part of your life.

I love history, its a tale our own infinite self, the story of all the pieces that connected in order for each of us to be born. However, there is always more than our own painted version of what we see, particularly with history. I would like to demonstrate how information in a man made world is distorted and things we believe that have ended have in reality only transmutated. For example, the atrocities of Nazi Germany are known to so many people around world, and will forever remain synonymous with hate and "evil". But to expose the roots on this tree, we must look at what nurtures its growth, who is the  soil, who is the water? They are companies who thrive today such as; JP Morgan, Ford, General Motors, General electric, City Bank, Standard Oil, Chase Bank, Dupont, IBM, the Rockefeller Foundation; all of these companies funded and aided the rise of Hitler and the Reich until the very end and continued to grow after the war. How could that be, when our recent Presidents Grandfather Prescott Bush was indicted for trading with the enemies act for his involvement with Germany at that time?

The very heart of Hitler's war machine was the chemical giant, I.G. Farben (that produced Zyklon B Gas used in the camps) which had an American arm that was controlled by the Rothschild's and the Warburgs. Paul Warburg, who manipulated into existence the privately-owned "central bank" of America, the Federal Reserve, in 1913, was on the board of American I.G. Indeed Hitler's I.G. Farben, which ran the slave labor camp at Auschwitz, was, in reality, a division of Standard Oil, officially owned by the Rockefellers.

The American Medical Association, IG Farben, Bayer, and even then Arbeit macht frei" which is now "Codex Alimentarius or the new global food control policy were part of and contributors to Hitler and his power development. At the time, our governments under operation paper clip provided amnesty and refuge to the Nazi scientists responsible for the holocaust. These scientists were given top positions in weapon developments, bio-warfare and medicine which have shaped our world.

The Rockefellers who bankrolled our medical system along with the AMA were directly involved in preparing and carrying out the horror of the holocaust. Madison Grants race based book and other U.S. eugenicists helped Hitler create his eugenics policies. By 1927 eugenics in the U.S. was widespread. When Hitler came to power his first act was to pass eugenics laws modeled after the U.S. as seen in the film "tomorrows children" in 1934. American scientists and eugenicists Davenport, Laughlin and Goeth were dispatched to Germany to advise the Nazis on carrying out the atrocities we have come to know today. With strong support from the U.S. (i.e. the people who own the banks that create the wealth of the nation; Rockefellers, Rothschilds) the Nazis rose to power.

In the end of the war the allies fought over who would get the SS doctors for their own purposes. Known as the Dr. of death, Von Verschuer continued his work in Germany after the war, the work that destroyed millions of lives. He was permitted to by the allies. The deal bringing Hitler into the government was cut at the home of banker Baron Kurt Von Schroeder on January 4, 1933. Other notable figures that are said to have appeared at this meeting include Council on Foreign Relations members John Foster Dulles, and Allen Dulles, of the New York law firm Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Schroeder bank. Allen Dulles would eventually become director of the CIA.

**So you see, things never end, they simply change shape.**

I believe true spirituality is being responsible with the power of thought, word and information that influences people and our own hearts. We as beings are indefinable, without form, our true essence multi-dimensional. To be a proponent of growth in others and the records of truth and wisdom that is the subconscious mind, we need to siphon out disinformation and know what it means to truly keep a high vibration by aligning ourselves with light; the light that is the collective truth of our past which without clear knowing will not propel us forward.

The war was funded by both sides, this is not fiction, this is indisputable fact. Yet the financiers and parties involved continued business as usual, so what does that mean? What does it mean when the same people and their companies have been quoted in books and article recently saying they are for population control, forced sterilization and modern eugenics? Does this not sound familiar? These roots over time reached deeper and formed current and upcoming policy such as forced vaccination, food control, open surveillance, militarization of the police and the same global and economic policies we saw during the time of the Reich. Moreso, beyond Hitler being supported and lifted to power by the allies (with a cover on time magazine to boot), he was funded by and according to historians possibly related to the Rothschilds; the Jewish family who owns the central banks,brought the use of the star of David to the Israeli flag and who owned the German media companies during the war that used propaganda for the war. The Rothschilds who funded and helped Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel commit the largest mass killing in our history, bigger than the holocaust. The Rothschilds who helped found the CFR who now dominate our current administration.

We can open ourselves to positive living only when we have dispelled ignorance. Otherwise it is wishful thinking, and we are not here to merely think, but do. If we are to speak, it should be in whole otherwise we have our own agenda, and do not serve truth. This is spiritual, it is positive, it depends where you take this information within yourself. They say the truth shall set you free. These truths, watered down by history and compulsory education have altered the dream in the consciousness of many. It is time to wake the dreamer and change the dream.

Abundance

I have abundance because I AM abundance. With no desire for wealth,nor fear of poverty one can give freely of possessions and time. This sets up a never ending flow of abundance.

A simple programming- secretly embedded in the subconscious of people always has them seeking for what is beyond themselves, somehow expecting to find answers to their questions. In order to have an answer you have to make yourself part of it. A free radical in the body steals electrons and moves around causing imbalance. Macro-cosmically we do the same, energetically taking things in our environment from external sources and trying to find balance. Money, houses, cars, relationships, we acquire these things because-..well we've been shown to and feel a great void within us if we don't follow suite. But why do we really seek these things? Why do we expect them to add something to our lives, and feel the sting of emptiness if we lose them?

Most people don't have an honest answer to this. This is not an easy path to walk down. You would have to discover, in your own personal experience why these things are part of your life and why you seek them out. Until then, a person is simply a broken record, mindlessly engaging in whatever enters their field of view. Simple interest, curiosity and thrill mean nothing. A person must search their heart and find WHY they have such desires, where they stem from, why they grow, and how they weaken the will. A person who acquires some wealth, or possession and then is saddened or knocked down by its absence does not know their own heart. Thus they are not ready for the WHY. Unless a person knows why they take certain paths, desires certain things, they will never be awake and never be free.

If you are alone, absolutely alone, and your happiness remains the same, then you have attained happiness- otherwise you have not. This is my child, this is my wealth: such thoughts are the preoccupations of fools. If we are unable to own even ourselves, why make such claims? Being alone and being lonely are not the same. The lonely seek friendship, the hungry seek sustenance, the angry seek conflict, the emotional seek drama, the fearful seek comfort. To be free of these patterns one has to seek the self; they must stop collecting information from books and outside sources and being collecting information from inside their own self. Otherwise a person will remain subjugated by their tendencies, and the seeking, regardless of its form; money, love, food etc. will always lock them in a prison in consciousness. Happiness is a person who wants what they have. Abundance is not a question of how much one has but of what one's attitude is toward what one has. And when the thirst dies down for such things, these things will be present with little to no effect on the individual. So do not seek abundance because it is here, you are it; simply find the direction life moves and go with it.

"Whether it be the lust for money, power or sex; the fire burns hot but seldom long. The warrior understands that once attained any desire is quickly replaced with another."

There is no oil spill

This is not an oil spill. Will it be a "spill" when millions of people in Florida, Texas and bordering states get sick or lose consciousness from the fumes in the air that will not dissipate? The corporate media, government officials and oil company executives continue to call the volcano of continuous gushing oil that is befouling the fragile Gulf ecosystem a spill.



A volcano that outflows over 21 million gallons of crude oil a week is NOT a spill. The common definition of a spill is: Liquid that fell out of a container, a one time occurrence- not a massive flow with no end in sight. There is a difference between a tanker spilling oil and the earth continuously spewing out oil from 35,000 within her bowels.



The definition of gush is to flow forth suddenly and violently. What we are faced with in the Gulf is a continuous and monster gusher of crude oil that has no known termination point.



So its a spill? No, its more than that. We have cut a vein in the earth and caused internal bleeding. This is a gusher. How long will the monetary cartels continue to call this gusher a mere spill or leak? Will people have to convulse and hemorrhage from their internal organs and lungs before the corporate media will show at least a modicum of truthfulness?



According to officials, soon the stench might become overwhelming on the Gulf coast and may not go away. This could impact the world permanently. The air will be poisonous and deadly, more so. Crude oil is composed of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, xylenes, hydrogen sulfide, benzene, toluene, ethlbenzene, trimethylbenzene, and other combination of toxic chemicals.



According to the federal register and OSHA, these are all extremely hazardous substances. Exposure can cause serious health conditions. High concentrations of hydrogen sulfide can cause headaches, dizziness, loss of consciousness and/or death.




With the approach of hurricane season, this adds to the damage that can be done. Any intense storm that hits the Gulf could produce unheard of destruction. Yet in the face of these facts our "free", "unbiased" media insists on calling this continuous gushing volcano of toxic crude oil a spill.



The damage done here is a thousand times worse that 9/11, with permanent ecological, economic and even agricultural impacts. Yet the people who orchestrated this disaster, and those who have failed to truly find a resolve go unabated.



So I ask you, has there ever been more evidence that the International Monetary/Banking cartel that own the major oil companies own our media as well? If you live near the coast, or care enough about this planet we all share, and wish for it to be clean and healthy for our future generations, contact your local media and officials and demand the facts be brought to the surface.

Medicine, Nutrition, Peer Reivew: synthetic health

"Note: This is not an easy read and is not intended for those with weak will power." In both nutrition and medicine, old truths though proven wrong (such as the germ theory) and funded science dominate the text books and minds of practitioners. Even though the average person guided under the current medical/nutrition model has health problems, still business is good. Practitioners of nutrition and medicine have a hard time understanding what is outside the lines of their knowledge. But there is more to actually knowing than mimicking what we learn through filtered teachings. As the proverb goes "I hear and I forget, I see and I remember, I do and I understand" Doing leads to realization. To study the principles of mountain climbing is to gain conceptual knowledge; to climb a mountain is to experience direct realization.



We can believe we know a number of things from gathered facts, data from books, newspapers, sources, online and more. But wisdom flows from life experience. When it comes to medicine and nutrition, a term I hear used time and again is "peer review." This term is used to validate scientific findings and research, particularly in medicine and nutrition. The overwhelming amount of individuals who have eradicated disease through real nutritional science does not register in the minds of the text book practitioner. They rely solely on the comforts and confines of the walls created in their "knowing" through education. A practitioner may not care for living facts if these facts have not been peer reviewed. What is peer reviewed?



(See more on peer review at the bottom) The term "Peer Reviewed" like paradigm is a buzz word used by people in an attempt to sound like they know what they are talking about. This can be easily recognized because it is always used in a pejorative sense. Dating back as far as the year 931, peer review was used in medical manuals as a duplicate note system to report the patients conditions. When the patient was cured or had died, the notes of the physician were examined by a local medical council of other physicians, who would review the practicing physician's notes to decide whether his/her performance have met the required standards of medical care. If their reviews were negative, the practicing physician could face a lawsuit from a maltreated patient. In today's health model the peer review system is a failed system. It means absolutely nothing. A lot of the harbored, useless truths found by medicine have shaped a world where the the majority of people are on medication. Yet if medication worked, we would need less of it each year. In studying pathology, you are told that the future looks dark as cancer and other diseases will only get worse. So if physicians were to still receive lawsuits for maltreated patients and failing to maintain health in the general public, would this put Doctors and nutritionists out of work?



The New England Journal of Medicine, a wing of the American Congress, and the World Health Organization all separately declared that 85-90 percent of all medical procedures offered in the doctors' offices and hospitals today are not backed by scientific research or evidence.



The medical model sets the framework for nutritional guidelines. Even holistic nutritionists follow the failed system that is beaten into them while in school. Real research has shown that people under guidance of even holistic nutritionists do not compare to people following a whole and living foods lifestyle. Under the guidance of more conventional holistic nutrition, patients tend to have more coagulation in the blood, mucus buildup in the body, less oxygen in the cells and have deficiencies, particularly with enzyme production. Truth is in the numbers. Whether or not the findings of Dr. Ann Wigmore or Dr. Brian Clement are peer reviewed, patient recovery in their nutritional approach outdoes any other approach to health. It's as simple as that. But it is hard for someone to understand something when their paycheck depends on them not understanding it. Our education is designed in a way that we become mentally, and even emotionally attached to the data we integrate. At the end of the 1800's the learning experience was gutted, and compulsory education began to bring in as it was called " An era of more factory workers and less factory owners." Right now in our society there is a decrease in the amount of high I.Q's because the learning experience is purely conceptual. In America, conventional wisdom that has mass acceptance is usually contrived: somebody paid for it.



In Trust Us We're Experts, Stauber and Rampton pull together some compelling data describing the science of creating public opinion in America. They trace modern public influence back to the early part of the last century, highlighting the work of guys like Edward L. Bernays, the Father of Spin. From his own amazing chronicle Propaganda, we learn how Edward L. Bernays took the ideas of his famous uncle Sigmund Freud himself and applied them to the emerging science of mass persuasion. The only difference was that instead of using these principles to uncover hidden themes in the human unconscious, the way Freudian psychology does, Bernays used these same ideas to mask agendas and to create illusions that deceive and misrepresent, for marketing purposes. Bernays popularized the idea of bacon for breakfast, even though there was no science behind it. Not one to turn down a challenge, he set up the advertising format along with the AMA that lasted for nearly 50 years proving that cigarettes are beneficial to health. Just look at ads in issues of Life or Time from the 40s and 50s.




During the next several decades Bernays and his colleagues evolved the principles by which masses of people could be generally swayed through messages repeated over and over hundreds of times. One the value of media became apparent, other countries of the world tried to follow our lead. But Bernays really was the gold standard. Josef Goebbels, who was Hitler's minister of propaganda, studied the principles of Edward Bernays when Goebbels was developing the popular rationale he would use to convince the Germans that they had to purify their race. PR had proven effective and would be used in a wide variety of ways.



Stauber tells the amazing story of how leaded gas came into the picture. In 1922, General Motors discovered that adding lead to gasoline gave cars more horsepower. When there was some concern about safety, GM paid the Bureau of Mines to do some fake "testing" and publish spurious research that 'proved' that inhalation of lead was harmless. Enter Charles Kettering.



Founder of the world famous Sloan-Kettering Memorial Institute for medical research, Charles Kettering also happened to be an executive with General Motors. By some strange coincidence, we soon have the Sloan Kettering institute issuing reports stating that lead occurs naturally in the body and that the body has a way of eliminating low level exposure. Through its association with The Industrial Hygiene Foundation and PR giant Hill & Knowlton, Sloane Kettering opposed all anti-lead research for years. Without organized scientific opposition, for the next 60 years more and more gasoline became leaded, until by the 1970s, 90% or our gasoline was leaded.



Finally it became too obvious to hide that lead was a major carcinogen, and leaded gas was phased out in the late 1980s. But during those 60 years, it is estimated that some 30 million tons of lead were released in vapor form onto American streets and highways. 30 million tons.That is PR, my friends. Today because of PR and psyops green washing the natural/organic wholistic movement has been hijacked and redirected. The health food stores are full of sugar,the only real food is the produce. But even organic produce is not as nutritious as we think, seeing how organic soil has only about 2 percent organic matter. The crops are harvested too early and lose a lot of nutritional value in shipment. Still places like Wholefoods are bringing more conventional products, closing the door on the local organic farms, the true sovereignty and freedom that made this country. This helps consolidate power for conglomerates and bring in new food laws like H.R. 875, the food safety bill and Codex.






The Takeover:

Along with the infiltration of our food, comes the infiltration of our health. In natural magazines people like Dr. Oz grace the covers. Dr. Oz who aligns himself with people like Dr. Anthony Fauci who between 1972 and 1974 joined with Merck, the CDC, and the FDA and created the 4 different sub types of Hep-B vaccines that were given to gay men in NYC, blacks in central Africa and Willowbrook states school mentally retarded children in Staten Island that triggered the international AIDS pandemic. And for those who need it, this is a scientifically published fact. Yet this man's work can be seen as valid because of research done that has been "peer reviewed." But of course, the intention of medicine and nutrition are designed weaken health and control, not cure disease.





David Rockefeller: Memoirs 2002 Founder of the CFR:



“We wield over American political and economical institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”



What do the Rockefellers have to do with medical science? Good question. John D. Rockefeller destroyed the understanding of health and help create the medical model we have now. The primary result of this activity was that his crude oil, worth perhaps a nickel per gallon, suddenly, turned into medical drugs, was worth millions of dollars per gallon. The initial changes in medicine seemed good, but the sinister and hidden purpose behind his millions of dollars of donations -- they are what we see today in the modern medical model -- based on drugs that don't cure, but increase the disease of mankind.The Rockefellers own the largest drug manufacturing combine in the world, and use all of their other interests to bring pressure to increase the sale of drugs. The fact that most of the 12,000 separate drug items on the market are harmful is of no concern to the Drug Trust.




"We doctors have been talking this medicine stuff into the people till they believe it." Dr. Schweningen (Physician to the late Prince Bismark



To teach the Rockefeller drug ideology, it is necessary to teach that Nature didn't know what she was doing when she made the human body. But statistics issued by the Children's Bureau of the Federal Security Agency show that since the all-out drive of the Drug Trust for drugging, vaccinating and serumizing the human system, the health of the American nation has sharply declined, especially among children. Children are now given "shots" for this and "shots" for that, when the only safeguard known to science is a pure bloodstream, which can be obtained only with clean air and wholesome food. Meaning by natural and inexpensive means. Just what the Drug Trust most objects to.



When the FDA, whose officials have to be acceptable to Rockefeller Center before they are appointed, has to put an independent operator out of business, it goes all out to execute those orders. But the orders do not come directly from Standard Oil or a drug house director. As Morris Bealle pointed out, the American Medical Association (AMA) is the front for the Drug Trust, and furnishes the quack doctors to testify that even when they know nothing of the product involved, it is their considered opinion that it has no therapeutic value.



"Before he [Louis Pasteur - the 'father of modern medicine' and originator of the Germ Theory of disease] died, he changed his mind. He ended up saying it's not the germ, but the conditions within the body..." Natural Health Lecturer: Ian Sinclair



Before the Rockefellers got involved, doctors were poor had a low social standing and as a profession had the highest rate of suicide. There were two opposing approaches to medicine, Homeopathic vs. Allopathic. Homeopaths practice a natural non toxic therapy designed to boost the body’s ability to heal. Where as allopaths were known for using toxic, unnatural treatments in trying to effect a cure. One of the best known allopathic treatments was blood letting, which had been practiced for centuries. One of the more famous cases involved George Washington who had come down with a bad soar throat. To help relieve him, doctors drained half the blood in his body, that didn't help so they had George swallow 650 mg of mercury. Mercury by the way is thousands of times more toxic and deadly than lead. George Washington died the next day; he was killed by some of the best Allopathic doctors in the country who were treating a case of strep throat. By 1900 much of the public had enough of these un-natural treatments and homeopaths were stealing patients from allopaths at an alarming rate. Around this time, the American Medical Association was formed as a doctors union to counter the growing power of homeopaths. As a a prominent member of the AMA stated:



"..we have never fought the homeopath on matter of principle. We fought him because he came into our community and got the business." - Dr. J.N. McCormack, AMA 1903




The AMA set out to destroy homeopaths and other competitors, which also included the military style raids of health food stores which closed them all down in the mid 1900's. Allopaths began labeling homeopaths as quacks, while harassing and slandering them. Backed by big business which smelled money in allopathic treatments, allopaths were able to change medical school curriculums, graduation requirements and licensing laws to favor allopaths and drive our any competition. The allopaths emerged as the victors, not because they had better medicines, but because they had made alliances with key business interests which saw fortunes to be made with new allopathic medical practices. The development of anesthesia and infection control meant a boom to surgery and financial interests started invest in hospitals and medical schools. Fortunes could be made because unlike natural remedies synthetic could be patented which brought investors flocking into the pharmaceutical field. Anxious to capitalize on this the AMA was quick to grant its seal of approval to any drug advertised in the AMA journal. As a result their advertising revenue soared, coupled with ads from the tobacco industry, the AMA Journal soon became the most profitable publication in the world. In other words, conventional allopathic medicines rise to power was due to the drug and tobacco money behind their medicine, not the patients they could heal. They played on people fears, addictions and ignorance to walk their way up to the top. No war crime or genocide has pulled off such horror and intent towards fellow human beings. It was profits, not proven medical benefits behind the adoption and wide spread use of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy treatments for cancer.



In the course of the last century the AMA aided by the FDA and others closed down hundreds of facilities which were using promising but non allopathic cancer treatments. In fact, several treatments had cured thousands of patients; these were well documented with reputable doctors confirming both the cancers and the cures. In the case against the doctor Max Gerson's nutritional treatment against cancer, Morris Fishbein attacked Gerson for "treating cancer patients with diet and warning them against cigarettes." Gerson had written extensive papers on his cancer therapies, which were published in the best European Medical journals, but he was blackballed in the U.S. and only one of his papers was published. Gerson would get calls from doctors asking " .. we know from your journals that you can cure cancer but we ask you what would we do with all of our expensive medical equipment, facilities, specially trained nurses and staff just throw them in huts and give them fruits and vegetable juices, we can't do that, there is no money in it."



" The inquisition is still with us. It is called the food and drug administration.. the national cancer institute.. the American cancer society and the AMA. They are allied together to destroy innovation in modern times. - Robert G. Houston



So what about the AMA? Fishbein, the President of the AMA first wanted to be a clown but then decided to attend medical school. His definition of a quack is “Someone who pretends to have medical skills he does not possess." Given the fact that Fishbein failed anatomy in medical school, never completed his internships, never practiced a day of medicine and never treated a single patient in his entire career, Fishbein himself turns out to be the ultimate quack. Usually the harsh words and things we project on to others are simply a reflection of our inner demons, our own insecurities. People now use the term quack or "psuedo science" for anything they don't understand simply because they have been taught to do so without questioning. Since it was founded the AMA's ultimate purpose is to eliminate competition to allopathic medicine, even if others can treat patients better than allopathic means. Nothing is allowed to get in the way of the AMA's business. So it comes as no surprise that the AMA has been sued four times for anti trust violations. In one case the AMA's goal was to completely destroy the Chiropractic profession, despite the fact that for over 40 years the AMA itself has shown that chiropractics were effective. The AMA was convicted in Federal court along with the American college of surgeons and the American college of radiologists.



So what is the agenda of the AMA and the Rockefeller empire?



'One of the most difficult concepts for Americans to accept is that there are human beings dedicated to coercive population control and genocide. Many readers will acknowledge that our government is helping to finance the Red Chinese program of forced abortion, forced sterilization, infanticide, and control of the numbers of live births. Most readers will accept the fact that our nation is helping to finance the United Nations' world-wide 'family planning program,' a form of population control. Most rational men and women, however, find it impossible to believe that such programs are really part of a 'master plan' to kill off large segments of the world's population.'




"One CFR published policy objective is substantial worldwide depopulation including half of the current U.S. population being targeted. This population reduction program is largely funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Merck Fund, both financially and administratively linked to the Merck pharmaceutical company--the world's leading vaccine manufacturer........Records show the Merck pharmaceutical company received a major share of the Nazi "flight capital" at the close of World War II when its president, George W. Merck, was America's biological weapons industry director. These facts were revealed by Norman Covert, Army public relations director at Fort Detrick in Frederick, MD, and veteran news correspondent Paul Manning in his book "Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile" (Lyle Stuart, Inc, 1981)



President Obama’s top science and technology adviser John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children. "If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels." Prince Philip of Great Britain, leader of World Wildlife Fund



Obama brought the CFR to Washington, whose roots run deep into Nazi and pre-nazi era world socialism and bio-experimentation. Along with the CFR, military and governments have been funding research of chemicals and medicines on the public without public knowledge. For example: In 1951-1960 the U.S. Army paid Israels health minister to do radiation testing on children to migrated to Israel. At this time the Pentagon had irradiated over 4,000 institutionalized children in the U.S., many of which died as a result of the testing. More than 110,000 of the darker skin children were given 35,000 times the amount of radiation to the head; most of them died in months. Even today the Pentagon and other agencies test AIDS drugs, pesticides and deadly chemicals on thousands of foster kids throughout the U.S. Eugenics was huge in the early 1900's in America and even inspired the atrocities performed by Nazi Germany. With companies such as Ford, IBM, Morgan, Chase, and many others funding the third Reich, Nazi medicine and experimentation was an extension of our own.



Here is a very short history of medical experimentation:



1931: Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, under the auspices of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations, infects human subjects with cancer cells. He later goes on to establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah, and Panama, and is named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. While there, he begins a series of radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients.




1932: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study begins. 200 black men diagnosed with syphilis are never told of their illness, are denied treatment, and instead are used as human guinea pigs in order to follow the progression and symptoms of the disease. They all subsequently die from syphilis, their families never told that they could have been treated.



1935: The Pellagra Incident. After millions of individuals die from Pellagra over a span of two decades, the U.S. Public Health Service finally acts to stem the disease. The director of the agency admits it had known for at least 20 years that Pellagra is caused by a niacin deficiency but failed to act since most of the deaths occurred within poverty-stricken black populations.



1940: Four hundred prisoners in Chicago are infected with Malaria in order to study the effects of new and experimental drugs to combat the disease. Nazi doctors later on trial at Nuremberg cite this American study to defend their own actions during the Holocaust.



1942: Chemical Warfare Services begins mustard gas experiments on approximately 4,000 servicemen. The experiments continue until 1945 and made use of Seventh Day Adventists who chose to become human guinea pigs rather than serve on active duty.



1943: In response to Japan's full-scale germ warfare program, the U.S. begins research on biological weapons at Fort Detrick, MD.



1944: U.S. Navy uses human subjects to test gas masks and clothing. Individuals were locked in a gas chamber and exposed to mustard gas and lewisite.




1945: Project Paperclip is initiated. The U.S. State Department, Army intelligence, and the CIA recruit Nazi scientists and offer them immunity and secret identities in exchange for work on top secret government projects in the United States.



1945: "Program F" is implemented by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). This is the most extensive U.S. study of the health effects of fluoride, which was the key chemical component in atomic bomb production. One of the most toxic chemicals known to man, fluoride, it is found, causes marked adverse effects to the central nervous system but much of the information is squelched in the name of national security because of fear that lawsuits would undermine full-scale production of atomic bombs.



1946: Patients in VA hospitals are used as guinea pigs for medical experiments. In order to allay suspicions, the order is given to change the word "experiments" to "investigations" or "observations" whenever reporting a medical study performed in one of the nation's veteran's hospitals.



1947: Colonel E.E. Kirkpatrick of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission issues a secret document (Document 07075001, January 8, 1947) stating that the agency will begin administering intravenous doses of radioactive substances to human subjects.



1947: The CIA begins its study of LSD as a potential weapon for use by American intelligence. Human subjects (both civilian and military) are used with and without their knowledge.



1950: Department of Defense begins plans to detonate nuclear weapons in desert areas and monitor downwind residents for medical problems and mortality rates.




1950: In an experiment to determine how susceptible an American city would be to biological attack, the U.S. Navy sprays a cloud of bacteria from ships over San Francisco. Monitoring devices are situated throughout the city in order to test the extent of infection. Many residents become ill with pneumonia-like symptoms.



1951: Department of Defense begins open air tests using disease-producing bacteria and viruses. Tests last through 1969 and there is concern that people in the surrounding areas have been exposed.



1953: U.S. military releases clouds of zinc cadmium sulfide gas over Winnipeg, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Fort Wayne, the Monocacy River Valley in Maryland, and Leesburg, Virginia. Their intent is to determine how efficiently they could disperse chemical agents.



1953: Joint Army-Navy-CIA experiments are conducted in which tens of thousands of people in New York and San Francisco are exposed to the airborne germs Serratia marcescens and Bacillus glogigii.



1953: CIA initiates Project MKULTRA. This is an eleven year research program designed to produce and test drugs and biological agents that would be used for mind control and behavior modification. Six of the sub-projects involved testing the agents on unwitting human beings.



1955: The CIA, in an experiment to test its ability to infect human populations with biological agents, releases a bacteria withdrawn from the Army's biological warfare arsenal over Tampa Bay, Fl.




1955: Army Chemical Corps continues LSD research, studying its potential use as a chemical incapacitating agent. More than 1,000 Americans participate in the tests, which continue until 1958.



1956: U.S. military releases mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, Ga and Avon Park, Fl. Following each test, Army agents posing as public health officials test victims for effects.



1958: LSD is tested on 95 volunteers at the Army's Chemical Warfare Laboratories for its effect on intelligence.



1960: The Army Assistant Chief-of-Staff for Intelligence (ACSI) authorizes field testing of LSD in Europe and the Far East. Testing of the european population is code named Project THIRD CHANCE; testing of the Asian population is code named Project DERBY HAT.



1965: Project CIA and Department of Defense begin Project MKSEARCH, a program to develop a capability to manipulate human behavior through the use of mind-altering drugs.



1965: Prisoners at the Holmesburg State Prison in Philadelphia are subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic chemical component of Agent Orange used in Viet Nam. The men are later studied for development of cancer, which indicates that Agent Orange had been a suspected carcinogen all along.




1966: CIA initiates Project MKOFTEN, a program to test the toxicological effects of certain drugs on humans and animals.



1966: U.S. Army dispenses Bacillus subtilis variant niger throughout the New York City subway system. More than a million civilians are exposed when army scientists drop lightbulbs filled with the bacteria onto ventilation grates.



1967: CIA and Department of Defense implement Project MKNAOMI, successor to MKULTRA and designed to maintain, stockpile and test biological and chemical weapons.



1968: CIA experiments with the possibility of poisoning drinking water by injecting chemicals into the water supply of the FDA in Washington, D.C.



1969: Dr. Robert MacMahan of the Department of Defense requests from congress $10 million to develop, within 5 to 10 years, a synthetic biological agent to which no natural immunity exists.



1970: Funding for the synthetic biological agent is obtained under H.R. 15090. The project, under the supervision of the CIA, is carried out by the Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick, the army's top secret biological weapons facility. Speculation is raised that molecular biology techniques are used to produce AIDS-like retroviruses.




1970: United States intensifies its development of "ethnic weapons" (Military Review, Nov., 1970), designed to selectively target and eliminate specific ethnic groups who are susceptible due to genetic differences and variations in DNA.



1975: The virus section of Fort Detrick's Center for Biological Warfare Research is renamed the Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the supervision of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) . It is here that a special virus cancer program is initiated by the U.S. Navy, purportedly to develop cancer-causing viruses. It is also here that retrovirologists isolate a virus to which no immunity exists. It is later named HTLV (Human T-cell Leukemia Virus).



1977: Senate hearings on Health and Scientific Research confirm that 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. Some of the areas included San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, and St. Louis.



1978: Experimental Hepatitis B vaccine trials, conducted by the CDC, begin in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Ads for research subjects specifically ask for promiscuous homosexual men.



1981: First cases of AIDS are confirmed in homosexual men in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco, triggering speculation that AIDS may have been introduced via the Hepatitis B vaccine



1985: According to the journal Science (227:173-177), HTLV and VISNA, a fatal sheep virus, are very similar, indicating a close taxonomic and evolutionary relationship.




1986: According to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (83:4007-4011), HIV and VISNA are highly similar and share all structural elements, except for a small segment which is nearly identical to HTLV. This leads to speculation that HTLV and VISNA may have been linked to produce a new retrovirus to which no natural immunity exists.



1986: A report to Congress reveals that the U.S. Government's current generation of biological agents includes: modified viruses, naturally occurring toxins, and agents that are altered through genetic engineering to change immunological character and prevent treatment by all existing vaccines.



1987: Department of Defense admits that, despite a treaty banning research and development of biological agents, it continues to operate research facilities at 127 facilities and universities around the nation.



1990: More than 1500 six-month old black and hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given an "experimental" measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected to their children was experimental.



1994: With a technique called "gene tracking," Dr. Garth Nicolson at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX discovers that many returning Desert Storm veterans are infected with an altered strain of Mycoplasma incognitus, a microbe commonly used in the production of biological weapons. Incorporated into its molecular structure is 40 percent of the HIV protein coat, indicating that it had been man-made.



1994: Senator John D. Rockefeller issues a report revealing that for at least 50 years the Department of Defense has used hundreds of thousands of military personnel in human experiments and for intentional exposure to dangerous substances. Materials included mustard and nerve gas, ionizing radiation, psychochemicals, hallucinogens, and drugs used during the Gulf War .




1995: U.S. Government admits that it had offered Japanese war criminals and scientists who had performed human medical experiments salaries and immunity from prosecution in exchange for data on biological warfare research.



1995: Dr. Garth Nicolson, uncovers evidence that the biological agents used during the Gulf War had been manufactured in Houston, TX and Boca Raton, Fl and tested on prisoners in the Texas Department of Corrections.



1996: Department of Defense admits that Desert Storm soldiers were exposed to chemical agents.



1997: Eighty-eight members of Congress sign a letter demanding an investigation into bioweapons use & Gulf War Syndrome.





"The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion). Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself."


-- Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine



The truth is that more people die as a result of their physician than any other cause, besides the state. Whether it is through drugs, bad nutrition or malpractice, the medical model we know has failed. If Doctors are responsible for setting the standards in health, then as a result of the mounting number of sick and heavily medicated people in this country, these Doctors should be out of work. When I hear debates regarding facts beyond the conceptual knowledge of textbook health, hearing words like "peer review" are sad attempts a person makes to feel valid. If people actually know medical and scientific history they would not be so quick to react and toss word around.



Peer Review:

Publish or perish is the classic dilemma of every research scientist. That means whoever expects funding for the next research project had better get the current research paper published in the best scientific journals. And we all know that the best scientific journals, like JAMA, New England Journal, British Medical Journal, etc. are peer-reviewed. Peer review means that any articles which actually get published, between all those full color drug ads and pharmaceutical centerfolds, have been reviewed and accepted by some really smart guys with a lot of credentials. The assumption is, if the article made it past peer review, the data and the conclusions of the research study have been thoroughly checked out and bear some resemblance to physical reality.



But there are a few problems with this hot little set up. First off, money. Even though prestigious venerable medical journals pretend to be so objective and scientific and incorruptible, the reality is that they face the same type of being called to account that all glossy magazines must confront: don't antagonize your advertisers. Those full-page drug ads in the best journals cost millions,Jack. How long will a pharmaceutical company pay for ad space in a magazine that prints some very sound scientific research paper that attacks the safety of the drug in the centerfold? Think about it. The editors aren't that stupid.



Another problem is the conflict of interest thing. There's a formal requirement for all medical journals that any financial ties between an author and a product manufacturer be disclosed in the article. In practice, it never happens. A study done in 1997 of 142 medical journals did not find even one such disclosure. (Wall St. Journal, 2 Feb 99)




A 1998 study from the New England Journal of Medicine found that 96% of peer reviewed articles had financial ties to the drug they were studying. (Stelfox, 1998) Big shock, huh? Any disclosures? Yeah, right. This study should be pointed out whenever somebody starts getting too pompous about the objectivity of peer review, like they often do.



Then there's the outright purchase of space. A drug company may simply pay $100,000 to a journal to have a favorable article printed. (Stauber, p 204)



Fraud in peer review journals is nothing new. In 1987, the New England Journal ran an article that followed the research of R. Slutsky MD over a seven year period. During that time, Dr. Slutsky had published 137 articles in a number of peer-reviewed journals. NEJM found that in at least 60 of these 137, there was evidence of major scientific fraud and misrepresentation, including:



* reporting data for experiments that were never done * reporting measurements that were never made * reporting statistical analysis that were never done






Dean Black PhD, describes what he the calls the Babel Effect that results when this very common and frequently undetected scientific fraudulent data in peer-reviewed journals are quoted by other researchers, who are in turn re-quoted by still others, and so on.



Want to see something that sort of re-frames this whole discussion? Check out the McDonald's ads which often appear in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Then keep in mind that this is the same publication that for almost 50 years ran cigarette ads proclaiming the health benefits of tobacco. (Robbins)



Very scientific, oh yes.